A coalition of religious leaders is suing to overturn Missouri's abortion 'trigger ban'
The National Women’s Law Center and Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed suit Thursday in St. Louis Circuit Court on behalf of 13 faith leaders in Missouri. The lawsuit claims Missouri’s so-called trigger ban and other laws restricting abortion access violate residents’ religious freedom.
Updated at 2:38 p.m. with new comments from Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey
Two national nonprofits have filed a lawsuit against Missouri officials in an attempt to overturn the state’s abortion ban.
The National Women’s Law Center and Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed suit Thursday in St. Louis Circuit Court on behalf of 13 faith leaders in Missouri.
The lawsuit argues that Missouri’s so-called trigger ban and other laws restricting legal abortion access violate residents’ religious freedom. It names the state, Gov. Mike Parson and Attorney General Andrew Bailey as defendants.
“We all agree that our freedom to live out our faiths or profess no faith at all is an inalienable right I believe bestowed by God,” said the Rev. Traci Blackmon, association minister of justice and local church ministries for the United Church of Christ and a plaintiff in the lawsuit. “Without this separation, there is neither religious freedom nor just law.
“I am not here to debate the morality of abortion with anyone," Blackmon said. “I’m here to defend women and birthing people’s right to not to have to — and to expose the hypocrisy of legislators who have behind a famed pro-life agenda while serving a pro death penalty state.”
The suit claims legislators used explicitly religious language when crafting and passing the laws, which violate the state’s establishment clause that separates church and state.
“Legislators who sponsored and pressed for this bill did so expressly in the name and service of a particular religious view that many Missourians and their faith communities do not share,” the lawsuit claims. “They openly invoked their personal religious beliefs as the reason for the law, enacting in the statute the religious views that “Almighty God is the author of life” and that ‘the life of an individual human being begins at conception.’”
It asks the court to bar the state from enforcing the abortion ban on the grounds that it violates the Missouri Constitution.
In June, Missouri became the first state in the nation to enact an abortion ban, just minutes after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned its 1973 ruling that made abortion legal nationwide.
Advocates for abortion rights note that the state’s ban is particularly burdensome to people of color, and that it compels people who need abortions to obtain them in the Metro East.
The plaintiffs represent Jewish, Episcopal, Methodist and other faith traditions.
While advocacy against abortion rights often comes from religious groups, faith leaders said there were many religions, including Judaism, that support a person’s right to obtain an abortion.
“Judaism demands demands of me my first priority must be to the living, breathing fully formed person sitting in front of me,” said Moharat Rori Picker Neiss, executive director of the Jewish Community Relations Council of St. Louis. “But I am not here today to advocate that Missouri incorporate a Jewish view on abortion into our laws. I’m here today because none of our religious views on abortion — or anything else — should be enshrined into our law.”
The suit marks the first attempt from Americans United, a Washington-based nonprofit that advocates for religious freedom, to overturn state-level abortion bans.
Religious leaders said the explicitly religious language state lawmakers used in passing abortion restrictions and the strength of the constitution’s church and state protections make Missouri a good candidate for a challenge.
Bailey said he plans to vigorously defend the state against the lawsuit. He noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has rejected similar arguments and that his office has won prevailed in another lawsuit before the Missouri Supreme Court.
"We look forward to doing it again," Bailey said. "I want Missouri to be the safest state in the nation for children and that includes unborn children."
Missouri Senate President Pro-tem Caleb Rowden, R-Columbia, called the lawsuit “foolish.”
“Legislators were acting on the belief that life is precious and should be treated as such,” said Rowden, who voted to pass the 2019 law that put the trigger ban in place. “I don’t think that’s a religious belief. I think people need to understand what the separation of church and state is, most people don’t.”
More than a dozen states have put full abortion bans in place since the high court overturned Roe vs. Wade.
According to the Center for Reproductive Rights, a legal nonprofit that advocates for abortion access, advocates and courts across the country have filed lawsuits challenging state-level abortion bans that went into effect after Roe.
Statehouse reporter Sarah Kellogg contributed to this report
Copyright 2023 St. Louis Public Radio