© 2026 Kansas City Public Radio
NPR in Kansas City
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments in Roundup cancer labeling case from Missouri

The case could have broad implications for whether people can sue over pesticides and herbicides.
Eli Chen
/
St. Louis Public Radio
The case could have broad implications for whether people can sue over pesticides and herbicides.

At issue is whether states like Missouri are barred from requiring products like Roundup to include warning labels indicating a cancer risk.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on Monday about whether a St. Louis-based jury was mistaken when awarding damages over how Roundup labels its product.

It's a case that could have broad implications for whether people can sue over pesticides and herbicides.

In 2023, a jury awarded St. Louis resident John Durrell $1.25 million because Roundup didn't have a label warning that the weedkiller carries a cancer risk.

Monsanto representatives have long disputed claims that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is linked to cancer. Bayer, which purchased Monsanto in 2018, no longer uses glyphosate in products intended for residential use.

Paul Clement, an attorney for Bayer, said that since the Environmental Protection Agency doesn't require a specific warning about cancer risk, states like Missouri aren't allowed to impose additional labeling requirements.

"The EPA regulation and the government's brief here makes crystal clear that a registrant cannot change the safety warnings on a pesticide label without approval of the agency," Clement said.

Clement was referring to how the Trump administration is siding with Bayer in this case.

"EPA registers pesticides only if EPA approves their labels as adequate to protect health," said Deputy Solicitor General Sarah Harris. "Federal law then requires manufacturers to keep using that label. Manufacturers must apply to amend registration to change the label."

Ashley Keller, an attorney for Durrell, said that in order for Bayer's argument to work, it would require the court to overturn legal precedent showing that products can be labeled wrong – even when the EPA approves the product.

"Monsanto now asks you for the opposite, holding that Roundup cannot be misbranded as a matter of law, because EPA found for the first time, 50 years ago as a matter of fact, that it is safe based on information Monsanto submitted," Keller said.

If Bayer is successful, it could stymie thousands of similar lawsuits across the country based on pesticide and herbicide labeling.

Copyright 2026 St. Louis Public Radio

Since entering the world of professional journalism in the mid-2000s, Jason Rosenbaum dove head first into the world of politics, policy and even rock and roll music. Email him at jrosenbaum@stlpr.org
KCUR is here for Kansas City, because Kansas City is here for KCUR.

Your support makes KCUR's work possible — from reporting that keeps officials accountable, to storytelling that connects our community. You can make sure the future of local journalism is strong.