© 2024 Kansas City Public Radio
NPR in Kansas City
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Missouri executes Marcellus Williams for 1998 murder he said he didn’t commit

A St. Louis County circuit judge accepted a deal that will keep Marcellus Williams in prison for life without parole. But, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is fighting the legality of the deal.
Jeremy Weis
/
Special to Midwest Innocence Project
The U.S. Supreme Court, Missouri Supreme Court and Gov. Mike Parson declined to stop the execution of Marcellus Williams.

Marcellus Williams had always maintained that he had nothing to do with the stabbing death of a former St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter. State and federal courts rejected numerous last-minute requests to halt the execution and review the case.

A St. Louis man has been put to death for a 1998 murder that advocates say he did not commit.

Marcellus Williams died by lethal injection Tuesday evening, shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected several last-minute requests to halt the execution. The state Supreme Court allowed the execution to go forward on Monday, the same day that Gov. Mike Parson refused to grant clemency.

“Tonight, we all bear witness to Missouri’s grotesque exercise of state power,” Tricia Rojo Bushnell, the executive director of the Midwest Innocence Project, said in a statement. “Let it not be in vain. This should never happen, and we must not let it continue.”

Parson said he hoped the execution would give “finality to a case that has languished for decades.” He said the legal proceedings had “revictimized” the family of Felicia Gayle, a former St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter who was fatally stabbed in her University City home in August 1998.

Gayle’s family, while believing Williams was guilty of her killing, had come to oppose his execution.

In a final statement Williams, who became a devout Muslim during his time in prison, gave “all praise to Allah in every situation.”

Williams had always maintained he had nothing to do with the murder of Gayle. Police would find some of Gayle’s possessions in a car that belonged to Williams, and he pawned a laptop belonging to her husband. But no forensic evidence like DNA, hair or fingerprints ever tied him to the scene. He was convicted largely based on the testimony of a former girlfriend, Laura Asaro, and a jailhouse informant named Henry Cole.

In 2017, Asaro called an activist based in Kansas City, reportedly to recant her statements against Williams. But Asaro’s mother would allegedly not allow her to finish the call. Asaro and Cole have both since died.

St. Louis County prosecutor Wesley Bell believed Williams was innocent of the crime, and filed a motion to vacate the conviction in January. He initially focused on three experts who said unknown DNA found on the handle of the knife used as the murder weapon could not be from Williams. But further testing revealed that the DNA most likely belonged to two former employees of the prosecutor’s office. One would later admit in court that he touched the knife without gloves multiple times ahead of trial. While those findings meant the evidence had been contaminated, it also no longer pointed to an unknown killer.

Donna Walmsley, 75, from Saint Peter’s City, holds her sign up high when cars drive past outside of the Carnahan Court building on Tuesday, September 24, 2024. “People are not evil, we shouldn’t be participating that evil” says Walmsley.
Sophie Proe
/
St. Louis Public Radio
Donna Walmsley, 75, from Saint Peter’s City, holds her sign up high when cars drive past outside of the Carnahan Court building on Tuesday, September 24, 2024. “People are not evil, we shouldn’t be participating that evil” says Walmsley.

In an effort to save Williams’ life, his attorneys and Bell’s office reached an agreement in which Williams would plead no contest to the murder in exchange for a life sentence. When Attorney General Andrew Bailey objected, St. Louis County Circuit Judge Bruce Hilton ended the deal and proceeded with a hearing on the motion to vacate.

With their proof of an unknown killer eliminated, Bell’s office and attorneys for Williams pivoted to arguing that the handling of the knife represented a “bad-faith failure to preserve evidence.” They also asserted claims that prosecutors had prevented a juror from serving solely because he was Black, in violation of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1986 ruling in Batson v. Kentucky. But both Hilton and the state Supreme Court agreed that the “clear and convincing evidence” required under the state law governing motions to vacate a conviction was lacking.

“Despite nearly a quarter century of litigation in both state and federal courts, there is no credible evidence of actual innocence or any showing of a constitutional error undermining confidence in the original judgment,” Judge Zel Fischer wrote in Monday’s unanimous state Supreme Court opin

ion.
Copyright 2024 St. Louis Public Radio

Rachel Lippmann covers courts, public safety and city politics for St. Louis Public Radio.
KCUR prides ourselves on bringing local journalism to the public without a paywall — ever.

Our reporting will always be free for you to read. But it's not free to produce.

As a nonprofit, we rely on your donations to keep operating and trying new things. If you value our work, consider becoming a member.