Most Active Stories
- Getting To Know Midtown's 'Running Superman'
- Collector And Gallerist Byron Cohen Dies At 72
- Liberty Hospital Announces Layoffs, Citing Pending 'Health Care Storm'
- 5 Things You Should Know About The Genetically Modified Food You’re Probably Eating
- Insight Into The Trials And Joys Of Transgender Relationships
Mon January 14, 2013
Area Businesses Challenge Federal Birth Control Mandate
A federal court is scheduled today, to take up one Missouri business’ challenge to a recently enacted provision of the federal health law. The provision requires that most employee-health plans include no-cost coverage of contraceptives, but the rule has faced backlash from several businesses and lawmakers around the region.
*January 15, 2013 Update: A judge put Sharpe Holdings' case under submission and extended the temporary restraining order until a ruling is made on the injunction.
Private Businesses File Suit
Sharpe Holdings is a dairy company near St. Louis that last month, got a restraining order against the so called contraceptive mandate. The rule requires that employers provide birth control coverage to insured workers, unless the company is a religious group.
“Nobody has much trouble understanding that nonprofit religious organizations would have claims that would be founded on the first amendment, freedom of religion," says Tim Belz, a lawyer for Sharpe Holdings "But a for-profit company can be religious, too."
Belz argued that Sharpe is one of them, and that the owner has religious objections to covering certain kinds of contraceptives.
A judge has yet to make a final decision on the case. A preliminary hearing on the case is set for later today, as a temporary restraining order on the federal rule expires.
State Law At Odds With Federal Rule
The challenges come amid a recent court ruling that temporarily blocked a new state law from taking effect, which directly contradicts the federal contraceptive rule. Senate Bill 749, passed after the legislature overrode the governor’s veto last year, requires insurance companies to exclude birth control coverage if employers have religious objections.
Calvin Call, head of the Missouri Insurance Coalition, the group which filed the challenge, says insurers just want clarification on which rule to follow.
“We take no position on the policies underlying the state and federal laws that are in conflict,” says Call. “We just can’t comply with one without conflicting with the other. The court just needs to pick one, one way or the other.”
Hearings on that case are slated for next week and month.
Follow KCUR health news on Twitter.
Shots - Health News
Shots - Health Blog