© 2026 Kansas City Public Radio
NPR in Kansas City
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Kansas judge temporarily blocks election law repealing 3-day grace period for mail-in ballots

Advance mail-in ballot applications were at the center of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a 2021 Kansas law.
Illustration by Sherman Smith
/
Kansas Reflector
If the 2025 law had been in place in November 2024, more than 2,100 ballots that arrived at county offices in Kansas during the three-day period would have been disqualified.

A new law passed by Republicans in the Kansas Legislature repeals a three-day grace period for mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day. Civic groups sued, calling it a “deliberate and unconstitutional assault on Kansans’ fundamental right to vote.”

A Douglas County District Court judge issued a temporary injunction Thursday keeping in place a 2017 state law allowing the counting of advance mail ballots postmarked by Election Day but arriving at county offices up to three days after polls closed.

Judge Carl Folsom’s order placed a hold on a 2025 law that required rejection of advance mail-in ballots not received by county election officials by 7 p.m. on Election Day.

The lawsuit by Kansas Appleseed, Loud Light, the Disability Rights Center of Kansas and three Kansas voters asserted repeal of the three-day grace period was a “deliberate and unconstitutional assault on Kansans’ fundamental right to vote.” The plaintiffs filed the suit against Secretary of State Scott Schwab and Douglas County Clerk Jamie Shew.

“After considering the extensive briefing and evidence submitted on this issue, the court grants the temporary injunction requested by plaintiffs,” the judge’s order says. “The deadline for the receipt by mail of the advance voting ballots by the office of the county election officer shall be the last delivery of mail by the United States Postal Service on the third day following the date of the election.”

Folsom said in the order “plaintiffs are substantially likely to prevail on each of their claims” outlined in the lawsuit.

The lawsuit filed in May 2025 contended Senate Bill 4 violated equal protection, due process and right to vote sections of the Kansas Constitution because ballots that were timely voted and mailed could be rejected under the new law because of arbitrary factors beyond control of voters.

Folsom said the injunction wasn’t a final determination of claims in the lawsuit. His order temporarily retained the three-day grace period in upcoming Kansas elections, including the August primary, to prevent “plaintiffs from suffering irreparable injury during the pendency of this lawsuit.”

The statute repealing the grace period was adopted by Republican majorities in the House and Senate and was to apply to in Kansas elections after Jan. 1. It was championed by legislators and lobbyists who argued change was necessary to address potential election fraud.

Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly vetoed the bill because of her apprehension it would disenfranchise voters, but the Legislature voted to override the governor.

If the 2025 law had been in place in November 2024, more than 2,100 ballots that arrived at county offices in Kansas during the three-day period would have been disqualified.

Folsom, who was a recent finalist for a vacancy on the Kansas Supreme Court, said in the 54-page order that advance voting by mail was a “powerful tool that can facilitate broader voter engagement, not only among voters who may otherwise struggle to vote due to disabilities or geography, but also by increasing turnout among underrepresented and underserved populations.”

He said the heart of the lawsuit drew upon undisputed evidence that voters who accepted Kansas’ invitation to use and return advance ballots by mail and to exercise their right to vote were at risk of having those ballots rejected because of delivery delays by the U.S. Postal Service.

“Kansas voters who submit their lawful advance ballots by mail, who do their part and vote and timely return it, should be able to trust that their ballot will be counted,” Folsom’s order said.

In 2017, then-Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who is now the state’s attorney general, was a proponent of legislation establishing the three-day grace period for mail ballots. In April 2017, House Bill 2158 was passed 123-1 in the House and 40-0 in the Senate. The grace period became state law effective July 1, 2017, after Republican Gov. Sam Brownback signed the bipartisan bill.

Folsom said legislative testimony last year regarding the bill to repeal the three-day window indicated the U.S. Postal Service’s ability to promptly deliver mail ballots had deteriorated since Kansas implemented that law.

In 2024, a federal audit of the U.S. Postal Service found the Kansas-Missouri district’s on-time mail delivery rate had fallen to the fourth worst in the nation.

Schwab, the state’s top election official and a defendant in the lawsuit, said two years ago the U.S. Postal Service had become so slow the “Pony Express is more efficient.”

“If SB 4 were in place for the past three major general elections, tens of thousands of lawful voters would have had their ballots disregarded and not counted,” Folsom said in the court order. “The grace period did what it was designed to do, saving thousands of ballots from rejection that were postmarked before Election Day, but arrived sometime in the three days thereafter. Without the grace period, all of these voters would have been disenfranchised.”

This story was originally published by the Kansas Reflector.

Tim Carpenter has reported on Kansas for 35 years. He covered the Capitol for 16 years at the Topeka Capital-Journal and previously worked for the Lawrence Journal-World and United Press International.
KCUR is here for Kansas City, because Kansas City is here for KCUR.

Your support makes KCUR's work possible — from reporting that keeps officials accountable, to storytelling that connects our community. You can make sure the future of local journalism is strong.